PAKPAC has started a
new section on its
website for
blogging. This will
help us understand
better what are the
community needs,
issues and opinions.
Read current blogs.
PAKPAC would like
for you to
participate in these
blogs, to submit a
blog send it to Myra
at
myrachaudhary@gmail.com
PAKPAC NEEDS YOUR
SUPPORT:
PAKPAC request
our supporters and all
the Pakistani American
Community Members to
help us in carrying out
our much needed work. NO
community has been able
to be a strong political
voice without the STRONG
financial support from
all of the people. As we
continue to be a voice
on the Hill with a
capacity to make a
meaningful change in
specific targeted
political races, a voice
to share concerns first
hand with the
administrative branch of
our government and
further strengthen our
presence and
effectiveness by
capacity building of our
community at the grass
root levels, we ask you
to join in and support
your present and your
future by making you
political contribution
to PAKPAC.
You can help PAKPAC activities by visiting
the link below
Pakistanis
celebrated the 134th
birth anniversary of
the Father of the
Nation Quaid-e-Azam
Muhammad Ali Jinnah
with great
enthusiasm and
national spirit. The
day was celebrated
with a pledge to
transform Pakistan
into a vibrant,
progressive and
enlightened country
as envisioned by the
great leader as well
as to follow his
principals "Unity,
Faith and
Discipline".
Numbers of
political, social,
cultural and
educational
institutions,
parties and
organizations
arranged various
programs to mark the
occasion in a
befitting manner
Republican Rep.
Peter King of New
York plans to hold
hearings in Congress
next year on the
"radicalization" of
Muslim communities.
King is planning to
hold the hearings
once he takes up the
chairmanship of the
House Homeland
Security Committee.
He says the hearings
are planned in
response to
complaints from law
enforcement
officials that
Muslim leaders have
been uncooperative
in terror
investigations.
"When I meet with
law enforcement,
they are constantly
telling me how
little cooperation
they get from Muslim
leaders," King told
the Times. "It is
controversial. But
to me, it is
something that has
to be discussed."
Read More
The untimely passage
of Ambassador
Richard Holbrooke
leaves big shoes to
fill in the AfPak
region. It may take
two men to replace
him.
In
a
column
that Holbrooke wrote
for the
Washington Post
in March 2008,
entitled "Hope in
Pakistan: the
problems are real,
but so is progress"
he captured the
essence of the US
relationship with
that "most allied of
allies":
Over decades,
Washington has
usually sent mixed
signals to Pakistan.
This time the
message should be
clear and
consistent:
democracy,
reconciliation, the
military out of
politics, a new
policy for the
tribal areas -- and
more democracy.
Holbrooke truly got
Pakistan in many
ways, even though
his tough approach
to negotiations
sometimes alienated
key players on the
other side of the
table in both
Pakistan and
Afghanistan. That is
what will make it
difficult for
President Barack
Obama to replace him
at the critical
juncture in the US
engagement with the
region. Read
More
The new year will
mark a new chapter
in the war in
Afghanistan.
President Obama has
said that starting
in July he wants to
start drawing down
U.S. troop levels.
How many troops
leave will depend in
large part on what
kind of progress is
made in the next six
months. If that
progress is
underwhelming, there
may be calls to
change the strategy
altogether. And some
alternatives are
already in the
making.
Things could go well
in Afghanistan in
the next six months:
The Karzai
government could get
in line, the
Pakistanis could do
more to pressure the
Taliban, and the
overall violence
level in Afghanistan
could drop. But if
that doesn't happen,
there are several
people beginning to
plot out
alternatives.
Richard Armitage,
who served as deputy
secretary of state
in the last Bush
administration, is
one of them. "I
think Afghanistan is
quite important to
us, but it's not of
overriding
importance to our
national interests,"
he says.
Read More
With small business
owners and
entrepreneurs in
traditionally
underserved
communities
continuing to face
challenges accessing
capital, the U.S.
Small Business
Administration
announced two new
initiatives aimed at
increasing
SBA-backed loans to
small businesses in
these markets.
The two new loan
initiatives –
Small Loan Advantage
and Community
Advantage – are
aimed at increasing
the number of
lower-dollar SBA
7(a) loans going to
small businesses and
entrepreneurs in
underserved
communities. The
agency’s most
popular loan
product, 7(a)
government-guaranteed
loans can be used
for variety of
general business
purposes, including
working capital and
purchases of
equipment and real
estate.
“Over the last two
years, we’ve seen
lending to all small
businesses tighten
up, and that
tightening has been
even greater in
traditionally
underserved
communities,
including among
minorities, women
and in rural areas,”
SBA Administrator
Karen Mills said.
“These new Advantage
initiatives are
aimed directly at
getting more loans
into these markets
so these small
business owners can
get the capital they
need to start or
grow their business
and create good
paying jobs in local
communities across
the country.”
Built on what the
agency refers to as
its “Advantage”
platform, both Small
Loan Advantage and
Community Advantage
will offer a
streamlined
application process
for SBA-guaranteed
7(a) loans up to
$250,000. These
loans will come with
the regular 7(a)
government
guarantee, 85
percent for loans up
to $150,000 and 75
percent for those
greater than
$150,000.
Small Loan Advantage
will be available to
the 630 financial
institutions across
the country in the
agency’s Preferred
Lender Program (PLP).
Under PLP, which
includes most of the
agency’s highest
volume lenders, SBA
delegates the final
credit decisions to
lenders.
“Many entrepreneurs
and small business
owners across the
country have
enormous potential
to drive economic
growth and create
good-paying jobs in
their local
communities, but too
often they face
barriers in
fulfilling that
potential,” said
Hughes, who will
chair the council.
“I’m excited to be a
part of this effort
to strengthen the
link between these
entrepreneurs and
the SBA’s wide
variety of
resources. SBA
assistance played a
critical role in my
success, and I’m
eager to do all I
can to help make
sure others have
access to these same
opportunities.”
Rep. Peter
King plans to use
his new bully pulpit
to target
immigration. The New
York congressman,
who will become the
new chairman of the
House Homeland
Security next week,
told the New York
Post that he
will push for
legislation to
tighter border
security and arrest
more immigrants
crossing the border
illegally.
He
said President
Obama's immigration
policies were
failing "The Obama
administration
continues to display
an obvious lack of
urgency when it
comes to gaining
operational control
of the border, which
is absolutely
critical," King
(R-LI) told the
newspaper. King said
Obama has "done
little" during his
term to curb
undocumented
immigration, adding
that the country
needs a new game
plan "that
incorporates the
necessary staffing,
fencing and
technology to do the
job."
His proposals will
target private
companies that
employ undocumented
immigrants and
beefing up local
police to give them
free range to make
immigration arrests.
USCIS has issued a
revised
Form N-648
(Medical
Certification for
Disability
Exceptions) for
individuals with
certain disabilities
seeking exceptions
from the English and
civics requirements
for naturalization.
Many Pakistani
Americans will find
the new revisions
helpful in getting
US citizenship
applications
processed faster for
their parents or
relatives with
disabilities.
See attached fact
sheet for more
details.
PAKPAC wishes its
readers a prosperous
and glorious 2011
that rewards all
your future
endeavors with
success.
May next year bring
happiness, and good
health to you and
your loved ones; and
may all the seasons
of your life be
filled with Peace
and Joy.
In 2011 PAKPAC will
remain committed to
promoting the
welfare of Pakistani
Americans, and
improving
US-Pakistan
relations, as it has
done for the past
twenty one years.
PAKPAC thanks you
for your continued
support of its
activities and
programs, we could
not continue without
your support.
Last week, the
Atlantic Council's
South Asia Center
held a discussion
with
Gilles Dorronsoro,
Visiting Scholar at
the Carnegie
Endowment for
International
Peace, and
Ikram Sehgal,
Chairman of
Pathfinder G4S.
Shuja Nawaz,
the South Asia
Center's Director,
moderated the
session. With nearly
twenty percent of
the world's
population living in
India and Pakistan
alone, events in the
greater South Asia
region exert an
enormous impact on
the international
system. India's
rising economic
strength has been
accompanied by
increasing political
influence, as
evidenced by
President Obama's
recent visit to the
country in November.
Pakistan, devastated
this summer by the
worst flooding in
the country in
decades, continues
to play a complex
strategic role in
the security of the
region. What were
the major challenges
and triumphs in
South Asia over the
past year? What will
shape the
India-Pakistan
relationship in
2011? What are the
prospects for a
positive outcome in
Afghanistan as the
US and NATO begin to
reevaluate their
objectives for the
coming year?
Click here to view
the event on C-SPAN
Video
U.S. policy toward
Afghanistan involves
spending scores of
billions of dollars
and suffering
several hundred
allied deaths
annually largely to
prevent the Afghan
Taliban from
controlling the
Afghan Pashtun
homeland. But the
United States and
its allies will not
defeat the Taliban
militarily.
President Hamid
Karzai's corrupt
government will not
significantly
improve. The Afghan
National Army cannot
take over combat
missions from ISAF
in southern and
eastern Afghanistan
in any realistic
time frame. And on
December 15, the New
York Times assessed
that "two new
classified
intelligence reports
offer a more
negative assessment
and say there is a
limited chance of
success unless
Pakistan hunts down
insurgents operating
from havens on its
Afghan border". That
won't happen.
Read More
·
Yet at the same time
we are no longer
close to the
precipice of defeat
and strategic
disaster as we were
when the
president inherited
the war in January
2009.
At that time the al
Qaeda core
leadership in the
border lands on the
Pakistani-Afghan
border was under
minimal pressure and
planning new attacks
on America, their
Afghan Taliban
allies had the
momentum in much of
Afghanistan and were
gobbling up
territory across the
south and east of
the country rapidly,
and we had just
witnessed the
worst terror attack
in the world since
911 in Mumbai, India.
In both Afghanistan
and Pakistan Obama
inherited disasters
because American
foreign policy had
failed to develop
effective strategies
for both countries
and to resource them
properly.
·
Today the al Qaeda
core is under
considerable
pressure from the
drones.
For example, al
Qaeda’s number two
Ayman Zawahiri, who
used to put out a
new diatribe against
America every other
week or so, has put
out only four
messages so far this
year. His
operational tempo
has been disrupted.
But al Qaeda remains
agile, resourceful
and dangerous. Any
let up in pressure
from the drones
would allow it to
rapidly rebuild its
capacity to threaten
North America and
our European allies.
Read More
The long-awaited
White House Review
on Afghanistan
demonstrates that
General Petraeus’
counterinsurgency
strategy is
beginning to pay
dividends. The
additional U.S.
troops deployed to
Afghanistan have
helped the U.S. and
coalition forces
begin to uproot the
Taliban from some of
their traditional
strongholds in
southern
Afghanistan. The
most important task
now is to gain
greater Pakistani
cooperation.
There has been less
progress on standing
up civilian
government in the
areas cleared of
insurgents, however.
While the U.S. and
coalition forces
have shown they are
capable of clearing
Taliban from their
strongholds, they
have yet to
demonstrate that
Afghan civilian
leaders can hold
these areas once
military operations
subside. This will
be a key benchmark
to watch over the
next six months.
Read More
To many observers,
Pakistan has long
been at the brink of
an existential
crisis, much of it
due to a growing
insurgency
exacerbated by the
war in Afghanistan.
But now the economy
is in crisis, too.
The catastrophic
floods have imploded
the struggling
economy raising the
specter of
frightening
consequences.
Compounding that
crisis is
uncertainty over IMF
loans needed to
sustain the economy.
Meanwhile, the
Parliament is
deadlocked over a
sales tax to raise
desperately needed
revenues for the
government. Last
week's loss of a
small partner --
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam
-- in the coalition
for almost comedic
reasons underscored
the seriousness of
these crises.
More shocks and
warnings will follow
especially after the
release of the White
House Afghan review
last week.
Eliminating
so-called Taliban
sanctuaries in
western Pakistan was
a central conclusion
of that review.
Chairman of the U.S.
Joint Chiefs of
Staff Adm. Mike
Mullen reiterated
that point in his
latest visit to
Pakistan. The White
House will increase
pressure on the
Pakistani government
to act.
Read More
It is fairly
straightforward to
summarize the past
year in Iraq and
Pakistan, but a more
complicated matter
for Afghanistan.
This was the year of
two big developments
in Iraq: the major
reduction in
American combat
forces and a
protracted election
in which voting in
March was followed
by a nine-month
delay in forming a
new government.
Despite the
political confusion,
violence did not
escalate, and the
economy continued to
make slow progress.
Still, Iraq cannot
afford as much
stalemate in the
coming year as it
experienced in 2010,
and the new
government will need
to deliver security,
public services and
economic growth.
Pakistan had a
rougher year. The
summer floods may
have displaced more
people than any
other natural
catastrophe in
history. The good
news is that the
government’s war
against the
Pakistani Taliban
showed some
progress, if not in
reducing overall
violence levels then
at least in terms of
establishing greater
control over what
had been insurgent
strongholds.
Regrettably,
however, Pakistan’s
level of cooperation
with the United
States against
Afghan extremist
groups did not show
measurable progress
in 2010 and may even
have slipped
somewhat, despite
the increase in
effective American
drone strikes in the
tribal areas.
Pakistan’s civilian
government continued
to lose ground at
home politically as
well.
Read More
The Justice
Department today
announced a
settlement agreement
with the School
District of
Philadelphia and the
School Reform
Commission to
resolve an
investigation into a
complaint of race,
color and/or
national
origin-based
harassment of Asian
students at South
Philadelphia High
School, and
allegations that the
school district was
deliberately
indifferent to the
severe and pervasive
harassment. The
complaint filed in
U.S. District Court
for the Eastern
District of
Pennsylvania, made
by the
Asian-American Legal
Defense and
Education Fund (AALDEF),
alleged persistent
harassment,
including an
incident in December
2009, in which
approximately 30
Asian students were
attacked and
approximately 13
were sent to the
emergency room.
Under Title IV of
the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 and the
Equal Protection
Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment
to the Constitution,
school districts are
required to protect
students from
harassment based on
race, color, sex,
national origin or
religion.
With the cooperation
of the district,
AALDEF, numerous
community advocacy
groups, students,
and numerous
witnesses, the
department conducted
an extensive
investigation of the
school district’s
policies and
practices with
regard to
student-on-student
harassment. The
settlement agreement
will ensure that the
district: retains
an expert consultant
in the area of
harassment and
discrimination based
on race, color
and/or national
origin to review the
district’s policies
and procedures
concerning
harassment; develops
and implements a
comprehensive plan
for preventing and
addressing
student-on-student
harassment at the
high school;
conducts training of
faculty, staff and
students on
discrimination and
harassment based on
race, color and/or
national origin and
to increase
multi-cultural
awareness; maintains
records of
investigations and
responses to
allegations of
harassment; and
provides annual
compliance reports
to the department
and the PHRC as well
as makes harassment
data publicly
available.
In response to
requests for
assistance from
state and local
officials across the
country following a
rash of
bullying-related
suicides, U.S.
Secretary of
Education Arne
Duncan distributed a
memo to state
leaders outlining
key components of
strong state
bullying laws and
policies. The
technical assistance
memo is intended to
serve as a reference
for state and local
officials developing
or revising
anti-bullying
legislation or
policies. “We need
the commitment from
everyone at the
federal, state and
local level to put
an end to bullying,”
U.S. Secretary of
Education Arne
Duncan said. “I hope
that highlighting
these best practices
will help
policymakers as they
work to keep our
children safe and
learning.”
The
memo, which was sent
to all governors,
chief state school
officers and state
education boards, is
part of the Obama
Administration’s
commitment to
prevent bullying in
schools. In the
memo, the Department
compiled key
components of
existing
anti-bullying laws
from 29 states. The
laws were divided
into 11 categories,
which ranged from
listing examples of
bullying behavior to
specifying
procedures for
investigating
incidents.
Several states are
leaders in their
bullying policies.
For example, Florida
law specifically
defines prohibited
conduct, and Kansas
law clearly covers “cyberbullying.”
Washington state
regulations require
school officials and
employees to tell
certain personnel
about any bullying
they are aware of,
and Georgia
prohibits
retaliation against
those who report
incidents. And in
Massachusetts, the
state policy
includes a provision
to provide training
to an extensive list
of staff members to
help them prevent,
identify and respond
to bullying. In
addition to the
memo, education
officials are
preparing a
comprehensive
summary of state
anti-bullying laws
and conducting a
study of how those
laws are implemented
in the hopes that
the data could
further guide states
in crafting
effective
regulations.
“We have all been
told that bullying
has been going on in
our schools forever.
But we can stop it
now,” Duncan said.
“Strong
anti-bullying
policies instill a
climate that this
behavior will not be
tolerated.” For more
on the Education
Department’s efforts
around bullying
prevention, visit
http://www.bullyinginfo.org.
To read the
technical assistance
memo, see
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/secletter/101215.html.
The Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee (PAKPAC) is a nationwide, membership based, non-profit lobbying organization registered with the United States Federal Government. PAKPAC’s mission includes advancement and strengthening of U.S.-Pakistan relations. It is organized to be a unified voice on issues and concerns common to the Pakistani American community. PAKPAC’s focus includes an active environment to foster greater political and civic engagement amongst the Pakistani Americans. PAKPAC is also focused on collaborating with other regional and national Pakistani American organizations to ensue increased efficacy and reduced duplication of the stated goals. PAKPAC along with our affiliates is working to serve as a watch dog for inaccuracies and bias in media coverage about Pakistan and Pakistani Americans. We are also involved in educating media groups, journalists, politicians, academicians and members of think tanks about views of concern and importance to the Pakistani American community.
DISCLAIMER This e-newsletter is sponsored by PAKPAC for its readers and supporters. The items contained herein are published as submitted and are provided for general information purposes only. This information is not advice. Readers should not rely solely on this information, but should make their own inquiries before making any decisions. PAKPAC works to maintain up-to-date information from reliable sources; however, no responsibility is accepted for any errors or omissions or results of any actions based upon this information. If you have any questions regarding any of these items, contact the organizational representative of that source. This e-newsletter may contain links to websites that are created and maintained by other organizations. These site owners have intellectual property rights of the content. PAKPAC does not necessarily endorse the views expressed on these websites, nor does it guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information presented there. Furthermore, visitors should be aware that other sites linked from this e-newsletter may use persistent cookies that track visitor viewing habits.